The complete evidence register
All 34 records, with source references and limits. Source review dates appear on each record. Open any record below or follow its permanent link.
Legal identity
Section linkLegal identityRegistry record matchedLegal entity · Independent registry match
Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited
Legal entity · Independent registry match
Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited
What this means for your family
A matching legal identity helps you trace the organisation behind a credential or agreement.
- CIN
- U74999TG2016PTC113063
- LEI
- 894500OJYBVC18BUDN89
- Registry
- Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF)
- Live record checked
- 15 September 2026
What this supports
The official GLEIF record matches the company name and CIN. It reports entity status ACTIVE and LEI registration status ISSUED.
Scope & limits
A legal entity match establishes identity within this registry. It does not establish clinical outcomes, device permissions or current tax compliance.
Some company pages show a different CIN. The supplied change-of-name certificate and this GLEIF record support U74999TG2016PTC113063. The website references need reconciliation.
Source: GLEIF live API record; updated 29 April 2026; next LEI renewal shown as 25 June 2027.
Reviewed: · Exact official registry record checked.
Legal identityOriginal reviewedCompany incorporation & name history
The legal entity behind the supplied core credentials
Company incorporation & name history
The legal entity behind the supplied core credentials
What this means for your family
A documented name history connects today’s organisation with credentials issued under earlier names.
- CIN
- U74999TG2016PTC113063
- Issuer
- Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad · MCA
- Name-change certificate
- 18 May 2017
- Current name on certificate
- Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited
What this supports
The certificate records the change from Bharath Diagnostics Labs Private Limited to Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited. The CIN agrees with the live GLEIF record.
Scope & limits
A historic incorporation/name-change certificate establishes the recorded identity event. Current MCA filings, directors and compliance require current MCA records.
Use this identity consistently across the main website, referral portals and credential records.
Source: BHCL Inc.pdf, p1.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Legal identityOriginal reviewedDPIIT / DIPP · Startup recognition
DIPP8651 · Issued recognition with an updated-certificate check due
DPIIT / DIPP · Startup recognition
DIPP8651 · Issued recognition with an updated-certificate check due
What this means for your family
Startup recognition explains a business credential. Your child’s care plan should be evaluated using its own clinical and service evidence.
- Recognition number
- DIPP8651
- Issued
- 6 September 2017
- Date printed on older certificate
- Valid up to 21 November 2026
- Official historical corroboration
- Startup India list · 3 November 2023
What this supports
The supplied recognition certificate and an official historical Startup India list identify the company as a recognised startup.
Scope & limits
Recognition is distinct from a tax-exemption certificate, healthcare approval or an award. Current eligibility and status should be read from the updated certificate and applicable rules.
The older certificate uses a ₹100 crore threshold. General recognition rules changed in February 2026 to ₹200 crore; Startup India asks existing startups to download updated certificates. Do not infer current ineligibility from the old threshold.
Source: COR_DIPP8651.pdf, p1; Startup India list dated 3 November 2023, row 3630.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Legal identityOriginal reviewedUdyam · Enterprise registration
UDYAM-TS-20-0015132 · Business-registration record
Udyam · Enterprise registration
UDYAM-TS-20-0015132 · Business-registration record
What this means for your family
Enterprise registration makes the business identity and classification traceable.
- Registration
- UDYAM-TS-20-0015132
- Registered
- 9 June 2021
- Later snapshot
- Small · FY 2025–26; classification dated 1 April 2025
- Snapshot printed
- 29 November 2025
What this supports
The later supplied Udyam record identifies the company and records a Small enterprise classification for FY 2025–26.
Scope & limits
This is enterprise registration, not an MSME award or a clinical accreditation. Enterprise classification can change; the displayed snapshot is not a live September 2026 confirmation.
An older 2021 copy described the enterprise as Micro. Its file name included “MSME Award”; neither that name nor the older category should be used as the current claim. Banking and financial annexures are withheld.
Source: Udyam Certificate 2026 full.pdf reviewed through Drive; the file name does not change the 2025 print date.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Legal identityOriginal reviewedHistorical registrationGST · Registration and name reconciliation
Original 2017 REG-06 reviewed · Historical registration with the printed legal and trade names
GST · Registration and name reconciliation
Original 2017 REG-06 reviewed · Historical registration with the printed legal and trade names
What this means for your family
The printed legal and trade names help families and institutions match the supplier on invoices and records.
Source review conclusion
The supplied certificate establishes the registration details printed in 2017. Its former legal name is retained exactly as issued, alongside the company’s documented name-change history.
- Document
- GST REG-06
- Issued
- 9 December 2017
- Legal name on supplied copy
- Bharath Diagnostics Labs Private Limited
- Trade name on supplied copy
- Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited
What this supports
The 2017 GST certificate records registration under the names printed on that document. The MCA name-change certificate supplies part of the corporate-name history.
Scope & limits
The original retains the former legal name. A current GST taxpayer record or amended certificate is needed before describing the current name and registration status as matched. GST registration does not establish clinical quality.
Full tax identifiers and director annexures are excluded from this display. Use the current company-provided GSTIN in the official lookup.
Source: BHARATH HEALTHCARE GSTIN CERTIFICATE OF BHARATH- FULL.pdf, pp1–3; MCA name-change certificate, p1.
Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Historical certificate inspected; current amended legal-name match is not established.
Legal identityOriginal reviewedPAN · Corporate identity document
Corporate PAN card inspected · Identifier withheld from display
PAN · Corporate identity document
Corporate PAN card inspected · Identifier withheld from display
What this means for your family
The inspected corporate identity document adds an identity check while keeping the tax identifier out of public display.
- Entity on card
- Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited
- Date of incorporation shown
- 22 November 2016
- Document type
- Corporate Permanent Account Number card
- Access
- Identifier and QR withheld
What this supports
The supplied corporate PAN card identifies the company and its incorporation date.
Scope & limits
PAN supports tax identity. It does not establish current tax compliance or clinical authorisation. Live PAN verification has its own matching-information and OTP requirements.
No PAN number is derived from the GSTIN or exposed in this page.
Source: Bharath Healthcare PAN.jpeg; original image inspected.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Medical device regulation
Section linkMedical device regulationOriginal reviewedMD-5 · Class B manufacturing licence
PinnacleAI® GPT-OS v1.0.0 · Non-diagnostic developmental-support software
MD-5 · Class B manufacturing licence
PinnacleAI® GPT-OS v1.0.0 · Non-diagnostic developmental-support software
What this means for your family
A defined intended use lets your family understand what the software is designed to support and when professional clinical evaluation is needed.
- Licence number
- MFG/MD/2026/000248
- Issuer
- State Licensing Authority · Telangana Drugs Control Administration
- Licence holder
- Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.
- Issued
- 21 April 2026
- Intended population
- Children aged 0–12
- Intended functions
- Developmental ability measurement, readiness tracking, progress forecasting and adaptive therapy-plan support
What this supports
The supplied Form MD-5 licenses the listed Class B device for manufacture for sale or distribution at the specified premises. Intended users include parents, therapists, educators and caregivers supporting children aged 0–12.
Scope & limits
Applies to the named device, version, intended use and premises. It does not establish diagnostic authority, clinical effectiveness or the registration of every centre.
The operative licence reads 000248. A corrected forwarding letter also reads 000248; the older forwarding letter supplied as PinnacleAI®_SAMD_License_CL.pdf also reads 000150. The CL file is a forwarding letter, not a separate classification approval. Use the operative licence and corrected letter together.
Source: Original Form MD-5, page 1 including device annexure; supplied PinnacleAI®_SAMD_License.pdf re-inspected 18 September 2026.
Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Medical device regulationOriginal reviewedApplication + issued licenceCDSCO classification · Application and licence trail
Original application reviewed · Class B is recorded in the issued MD-5
CDSCO classification · Application and licence trail
Original application reviewed · Class B is recorded in the issued MD-5
What this means for your family
Reading the application and issued licence together helps you distinguish a requested classification from the device’s licensed classification.
Source review conclusion
The January application records a proposed Class A classification. The issued MD-5 identifies PinnacleAI® GPT-OS v1.0.0 as Class B. These documents are presented in their regulatory sequence.
- Reported file
- MD/classification/2025/150
- Reported decision date
- 13 April 2026
- Decision source
- Reported in the dossier and September handout
- Application source
- 8 January 2026 · proposed Class A
What this supports
The issued MD-5 identifies the device as Class B. Company publications describe a preceding Central Licensing Authority classification decision.
Scope & limits
The locally available risk-classification form is an application proposing Class A, not the approved Class B decision. A classification decision is also distinct from a manufacturing licence.
The separate 13 April 2026 CAL/decision is described in company publications; its issued copy was not available for inspection. This review does not authenticate that separate decision.
Source: Risk-classification application, p1; Evidence Dossier v2, pp23–24; September handout, physical pp1 and 9; operative MD-5, p1.
Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Application and issued MD-5 inspected; separate issued CAL not inspected.
Medical device regulationOriginal reviewedMD-3 · Manufacturing-licence application
Application record in the route to the issued MD-5
MD-3 · Manufacturing-licence application
Application record in the route to the issued MD-5
What this means for your family
The application explains part of the regulatory journey; the issued licence is the document to use for the resulting permission.
- Application reference
- MFG/MD/2026/189231
- Applicant
- Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited
- Form dated
- 17 April 2026
- Fee payment shown
- 16 April 2026
What this supports
The reviewed application records the applicant’s request for a Class B manufacturing licence and the stated device particulars.
Scope & limits
MD-3 is an application, not an additional granted licence. The permission is established by the operative MD-5 and its conditions.
The signed form date and the preceding fee-payment date are recorded separately. A portal-email screenshot in the supplied Pinnacle folder also shows submission on 16 April and application approval on 20 April 2026; the issued MD-5 remains the licence evidence.
Source: Original Form_MD_189231.pdf reviewed through Google Drive.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Quality & security
Section linkQuality & securityOriginal reviewedBIS · Medical device management system
IS 23485:2019 · Licence and scope schedule reviewed
BIS · Medical device management system
IS 23485:2019 · Licence and scope schedule reviewed
What this means for your family
A documented software lifecycle makes quality responsibilities and the scope of developmental-support modules easier to examine.
- Licence number
- MD/L-2026029599
- Issuer
- Bureau of Indian Standards
- Licence holder
- Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited
- Stated validity
- 3 September 2026 – 2 September 2029
- Named developmental modules
- AbilityScore mapping, Prognose, Everyday Therapy through TherapeuticAI, tracking and correction through Fusion
What this supports
The supplied BIS licence and schedule cover the specified software design, development, verification, validation, release, deployment, maintenance, support and post-market surveillance. The schedule names developmental mapping, planning, everyday practice, tracking and correction, with school, speech, motor, Study IQ, behaviour, self-sufficiency and mainstream-inclusion readiness modules across the developmental lifecycle.
Scope & limits
The licence applies to its schedule and listed address. It is not a guarantee of clinical outcomes for a child.
This September 2026 licence supersedes the “application pending” status in older company publications.
Source: Original BIS licence, page 1; scope schedule, page 2.
Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Quality & securityOriginal reviewedISO 13485 · Quality management
Medical device quality-management system · ISO 13485:2016
ISO 13485 · Quality management
Medical device quality-management system · ISO 13485:2016
What this means for your family
Quality-management evidence helps you ask how software development, changes and corrective action are controlled.
- Certificate
- 3050251115129MD
- Certification body
- QRO Certification LLP
- Certified
- 25 November 2025
- Stated expiry
- 24 November 2028
What this supports
The supplied certificate covers the named company’s quality-management scope for the design, development, deployment, maintenance and support of the specified SaMD.
Scope & limits
Certification applies to the certificate’s system scope. Historic “diagnostic mapping” wording does not extend the later MD-5’s non-diagnostic intended use. Accreditation-chain and live certificate status have not been independently checked.
First surveillance date shown: 24 November 2026.
Source: Original ISO 13485 certificate, p1.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Quality & securityOriginal reviewedISO/IEC 27001 · Information security
Information-security management system · ISO/IEC 27001:2022
ISO/IEC 27001 · Information security
Information-security management system · ISO/IEC 27001:2022
What this means for your family
Information-security evidence helps you ask how sensitive developmental information is managed within the certified scope.
- Certificate
- 305025120207IS
- Certification body
- QRO Certification LLP
- Certified
- 2 December 2025
- Stated expiry
- 1 December 2028
What this supports
The original certificate covers information-security management for the listed SaMD platforms, cloud operations, cybersecurity, data protection and support.
Scope & limits
Certification does not guarantee zero breaches or cover every process outside the declared scope. Current certificate status and the accreditation chain remain separate checks.
The original reads 305025120207IS (letters I and S); some secondary text uses a digit 1. First surveillance date: 1 December 2026.
Source: Original ISO/IEC 27001 certificate; recognitions bundle physical p10; standalone Drive copy.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Research & outcomes
Section linkResearch & outcomesOriginal reviewedIndependent practitioner · Limited assurance
SAE 3000 · Institutional claims as at 17 July 2026
Independent practitioner · Limited assurance
SAE 3000 · Institutional claims as at 17 July 2026
What this means for your family
A clearly defined assurance scope helps you distinguish institutional-record checks from evidence about a child’s clinical outcome.
- Practitioner
- NPSY & Co., Chartered Accountants
- Firm registration
- 013580S
- Report dated
- 3 September 2026
- UDIN
- 26200027GMBLXU4868
What this supports
The report records limited assurance over its defined Statement of Institutional Claims using the Board-adopted criteria specified in the report.
Scope & limits
Limited assurance is different from reasonable assurance. Outcome-study figures, ratings and financial statements fall outside the described scope; the report does not independently validate clinical efficacy.
The report is marked private/confidential and restricted-use. Its full text is not republished here; permitted circulation should be confirmed before a public evidence-room release.
Source: Original seven-page SAE 3000 report; September handout physical p14 provides a secondary summary.
Reviewed: · Report inspected; UDIN not independently matched in this review.
Research & outcomesOriginal reviewedIndependent practitioner · Factual findings
SRS 4400 · Agreed procedures on institutional records
Independent practitioner · Factual findings
SRS 4400 · Agreed procedures on institutional records
What this means for your family
Specified factual checks make the counting method more understandable; they do not supply an assurance opinion on outcomes.
- Practitioner
- NPSY & Co., Chartered Accountants
- Report dated
- 3 September 2026
- UDIN
- 26200027HCNFEI9138
- Subject date
- 17 July 2026
What this supports
The report records factual findings from the specified agreed procedures on institutional claims and supporting records.
Scope & limits
An agreed-upon-procedures report is not an assurance opinion. Readers need the complete procedures, criteria and findings to assess its meaning. It does not establish clinical outcomes.
Restricted-use source. A UDIN lookup authenticates document particulars; it does not expand the report’s scope.
Source: Original four-page SRS 4400 report.
Reviewed: · Report inspected; UDIN not independently matched in this review.
Research & outcomesCompany-publishedScale claims · Dates and definitions
2.7 billion+ reported structured records · dated counts with defined units
Scale claims · Dates and definitions
2.7 billion+ reported structured records · dated counts with defined units
What this means for your family
Consistent records can support continuity across a child’s journey. Ask to see your child’s own goals and progress reviews alongside network-level numbers.
- Measurement date
- 17 July 2026, as described in the September handout
- Therapy services reported
- 31,052,382
- Operational centres reported
- 49 under the stated four-condition test
- People metric reported
- 792,614 unique beneficiary / family registrations
- Structured platform records reported
- 2,700,000,000+ observed database row/event counts
- Counting unit
- Discrete structured record: session entry, assessment observation, technique rating, sensor event or equivalent mapped field
- Technique repository update
- 130,000 entries; management-supplied 18 September 2026. Earlier 7 September handout: 90,000+ techniques.
- International reach reported
- Families from 70+ countries of origin, including remote delivery; company-reported
- Network reported
- 70+ centres including network stages distinct from the report’s operational-centre test
What this supports
The September handout reports 2.7 billion+ structured platform records and connects dated operational counts to specified procedures and Board-adopted criteria. It separately describes a 70+ network figure. The 2.5 billion floor assertion and 2.7 billion observed row-count finding have different reporting roles.
Scope & limits
Therapy services include assessments, screenings and parent training under the report’s criteria; they are not all one-to-one therapy sessions. Beneficiary/family registrations are not a count of unique children. Network and operational centres use different definitions. Platform records are not unique children, independent clinical-trial observations or verified, deduplicated AI-training examples. Volume alone does not establish model performance, clinical effectiveness or a worldwide size ranking. The 130,000 technique update has no inspected inventory extract; neither practitioner report establishes that updated count or the 70+ countries claim.
The July dossier used a 2.5 billion+ floor and retired earlier 2.7 billion wording. The September handout subsequently publishes 2.7 billion+ observed row counts. Limited assurance over the 2.5 billion floor is distinct from factual findings without an assurance opinion on the 2.7 billion row count. The 70+ network and 49 operational-centre figures also use different definitions.
Source: Company handout, 7 September 2026, physical pp3, 14–15; July dossier pp6, 74, 76, 79, 124. Restricted practitioner sources inspected: SRS 4400 pp2–3; SAE 3000 pp3–4 and criteria p6. Cutoff 17 July 2026. Technique count: management update received 18 September 2026; earlier 90,000+ in September handout pp5, 7, 15. Countries of family origin: July dossier pp75–76; network definition pp75–77.
Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Research & outcomesOriginal reviewedAbilityScore · Methodology preprint
Development and preliminary psychometric characterization
AbilityScore · Methodology preprint
Development and preliminary psychometric characterization
What this means for your family
A methods paper lets practitioners examine how a measurement approach was developed and where further validation is needed.
- Repository
- Zenodo
- Published
- 9 April 2026
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.19482123
- Publication type
- Preprint · preliminary evidence
What this supports
The public record describes the construction of AbilityScore and preliminary operational psychometric findings. The authors identify formal validation as planned.
Scope & limits
Operational inter-rater reliability is not completed external concurrent validity. A repository deposit does not establish journal peer review or independent replication.
Read reported measurement properties within the instrument version, methods and population stated by the authors.
Source: Original Zenodo repository metadata and abstract, retrieved 15 September 2026.
Reviewed: · Repository metadata checked; journal peer review not established.
Research & outcomesOriginal reviewedStudy protocolAbilityScore · External-validation protocol
Original protocol reviewed · Version 2.1 sets out planned validation methods
AbilityScore · External-validation protocol
Original protocol reviewed · Version 2.1 sets out planned validation methods
What this means for your family
A published protocol makes the proposed research question and methods visible before a completed result is claimed.
Source review conclusion
The reviewed source is protocol BHCL-VAL-2026-001, version 2.1. It describes a proposed external-validation study and sample plan; completed validation results are not claimed.
- Protocol
- BHCL-VAL-2026-001
- Published
- 9 April 2026 · version 2.1
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.19482476
- Study size described
- Planned 300-participant component; 60-person retest subset
What this supports
The deposited protocol describes planned concurrent-validity, test–retest and minimal-clinically-important-difference research, including comparator instruments.
Scope & limits
This record is a protocol preprint, not completed results. It does not establish that the planned recruitment, testing or external validation has been completed.
Repository metadata was rechecked on 18 September 2026 and continues to identify the source as a protocol. A completed study report with methods, results and limitations would support a later conclusion.
Source: Original Zenodo record 19482476 and its metadata, retrieved 15 September 2026.
Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Primary protocol and repository metadata reviewed; completed comparator validation is not established.
Research & outcomesCompany-publishedTwelve-study portfolio · Company research
Study-by-study sources, populations and limitations
Twelve-study portfolio · Company research
Study-by-study sources, populations and limitations
What this means for your family
Study-level detail helps families and referring professionals see which children and outcomes a research statement actually concerns.
- Source type
- Company-authored research portfolio
- Summary editions
- 2025 Whitebook; July 2026 dossier; September 2026 handout
- Evidence design
- Varies by study; operator-network research
- Review boundary
- Portfolio mapped; full independent re-analysis not performed
What this supports
The source publications describe twelve research topics across measurement, therapy, home practice, equity and participation. The study index identifies the populations and available original report links.
Scope & limits
Small study cohorts cannot be replaced by cumulative network-service totals. Journal peer review, independent replication and ethics approval require their own documents. Findings apply to the populations and methods studied.
School-entry findings must remain qualified to children meeting readiness criteria; the parent-led generalisation report notes limitations and a non-significant home-adherence correlation.
Source: Whitebook pp12–21; Evidence Dossier v2 study register; September handout physical p8; company-hosted study reports.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Research & outcomesSource publications reviewedCompany-reported outcomeNetwork-wide improvement claim · Evidence definition
Company outcome claim recorded with its source and calculation boundary
Network-wide improvement claim · Evidence definition
Company outcome claim recorded with its source and calculation boundary
What this means for your family
Your child’s goals, starting point and reassessments make progress meaningful; a network headline cannot predict an individual result.
Source review conclusion
The headline outcome claim is recorded as company-reported. The supplied material does not establish a verified network-wide improvement percentage; the SAE 3000 report excludes outcome-study figures from its scope.
- Claim type
- Network-wide outcome statement
- Required basis
- Defined outcome, denominator and period
- Source status
- Company publications
- Assurance scope
- Outcome-study figures excluded from practitioner report scope
What this supports
The company publications contain a headline improvement claim and a twelve-study narrative. These identify the claim that needs a transparent evidence trail.
Scope & limits
The reviewed materials do not establish the full network-wide calculation or make it an individual outcome guarantee. Practitioner assurance over operational counts does not validate excluded outcome percentages.
A verified percentage would require the eligible population, denominator, measurement period, baseline and follow-up, assessment version, missing-data handling and reproducible calculation.
Source: Whitebook; Evidence Dossier v2; September handout; SAE 3000 scope.
Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Company publications reviewed; underlying network-wide outcome calculation not independently established.
Centre registrations
Section linkCentre registrationsWorkbook & certificate copies reviewedABDM / NHA · Health Facility Registry
All 52 workbook centres · 53 distinct HFR IDs across both source sets
ABDM / NHA · Health Facility Registry
All 52 workbook centres · 53 distinct HFR IDs across both source sets
What this means for your family
A facility identifier gives you a specific record to ask about when checking the centre your family will visit.
- Registry
- National Health Authority · Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission
- Workbook
- 52 centre rows; 52 unique HFR IDs
- Certificate copies
- 28 unique HFR IDs from 29 certificate entries
- Source reconciliation
- 27 IDs in both sources; 25 additional workbook IDs; one certificate-only ID
- Combined inventory
- 53 distinct HFR identifiers; not a count of confirmed active centres
What this supports
The complete supplied centre workbook lists 52 centres, addresses and HFR identifiers. Twenty-seven IDs correspond to the inspected certificate collection. The combined register preserves all 53 identifiers and labels the source and certificate-review level of each entry.
Scope & limits
Workbook entries are company-supplied, not live government registry checks. The RS column is undefined; its ACTIVE/INACTIVE flags do not establish current operational or HFR status. HFR is not clinical-outcome certification or a replacement for local permissions. A matching ID does not independently reconcile current addresses.
The workbook’s Tirupati entry is IN2810065148. The separately inspected IN2810053847 certificate is retained as an additional record; replacement, cancellation or address equivalence has not been established. Duplicate Srikakulam certificate copies count once.
Source: All Centers With HFR.xlsx, sheet All Centers With HFR, rows 2–53 (reviewed 18 September 2026); original recognitions bundle, physical pp67–95.
Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Centre registrationsCompany-publishedDisability-welfare registrations · District scope
29 Section 51 certificate copies described in the source collection
Disability-welfare registrations · District scope
29 Section 51 certificate copies described in the source collection
What this means for your family
District summaries help locate relevant institution documents; match the individual certificate to the exact premises.
- Legal framework
- RPwD Act, 2016 · Section 51
- Departments
- District welfare / disability-empowerment authorities
- Source grouping
- Eight districts · Telangana and Andhra Pradesh
- Current-status basis
- Certificate dates and renewals require centre-level review
What this supports
The source collection contains district-specific institution-registration copies. Four selected originals are documented below; the September handout groups the broader collection.
Scope & limits
These are separate institution records, not one nationwide DDEW licence. A network count should not be treated as proof that all centres hold current registrations.
The handout groups 19 copies within stated 2027–2030 date ranges and 10 on a renewal calendar. Current renewal originals and issuer status must be checked individually.
Source: Recognitions bundle, pp96–124; September handout, physical p12.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Centre registrationsOriginal reviewedAttapur · District institution registration
Section 51 registration · Named institution and location
Attapur · District institution registration
Section 51 registration · Named institution and location
What this means for your family
This document gives families an institution-specific registration to match against the address and service being considered.
- Issuer
- District Welfare Officer · Ranga Reddy
- Certificate reference
- Not entered on supplied copy
- Stated validity
- 8 January 2025 – 7 January 2030
- Scope
- The institution and address named on the certificate
What this supports
The supplied certificate records the named institution’s district registration under Section 51 of the RPwD Act.
Scope & limits
The record covers its listed institution and location. Face-date validity does not confirm that no later change, suspension or cancellation has occurred.
The certificate-number field is blank in the original; no number has been invented.
Source: Recognitions bundle, physical p97.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Centre registrationsOriginal reviewedBegumpet · District institution registration
Section 51 registration · Named institution and location
Begumpet · District institution registration
Section 51 registration · Named institution and location
What this means for your family
This document gives families an institution-specific registration to match against the address and service being considered.
- Issuer
- Hyderabad District · Disability Empowerment Department
- Certificate reference
- 32 of 2024
- Stated validity
- 17 December 2024 – 31 March 2027
- Scope
- The institution and address named on the certificate
What this supports
The supplied certificate records the named institution’s district registration under Section 51 of the RPwD Act.
Scope & limits
The record covers its listed institution and location. Face-date validity does not confirm that no later change, suspension or cancellation has occurred.
Source: Recognitions bundle, physical p98.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Centre registrationsOriginal reviewedNizamabad · District institution registration
Section 51 registration · Named institution and location
Nizamabad · District institution registration
Section 51 registration · Named institution and location
What this means for your family
This document gives families an institution-specific registration to match against the address and service being considered.
- Issuer
- District Welfare Officer · Nizamabad
- Certificate reference
- 05 of 2024
- Stated validity
- 5 January 2024 – 4 January 2027
- Scope
- The institution and address named on the certificate
What this supports
The supplied certificate records the named institution’s district registration under Section 51 of the RPwD Act.
Scope & limits
The record covers its listed institution and location. Face-date validity does not confirm that no later change, suspension or cancellation has occurred.
Source: Recognitions bundle, physical p118.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Centre registrationsOriginal reviewedHistorical · ended 30 Oct 2024Nellore · Historical district registration
Original certificate reviewed · Printed validity ended 30 October 2024
Nellore · Historical district registration
Original certificate reviewed · Printed validity ended 30 October 2024
What this means for your family
The historical record makes the earlier registration period traceable and identifies the renewal needed to establish current coverage.
Source review conclusion
Certificate 06 of 2023 documents registration for the stated Nellore institution during 31 October 2023–30 October 2024. It is retained as historical evidence.
- Issuer
- Welfare of Differently Abled & Senior Citizens · SPSR Nellore
- Certificate
- 06 of 2023
- Stated validity
- 31 October 2023 – 30 October 2024
- Renewal
- Not established by the reviewed original
What this supports
The supplied historical certificate records the named institution’s registration for the printed period.
Scope & limits
The face date has passed. This review does not establish the absence of a renewal, but cannot present the historical copy as current.
A renewal was not supplied for inspection. This historical certificate is not presented as evidence of current registration.
Source: Recognitions bundle, physical p117.
Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Original inspected; printed validity period has ended. Current renewal not established.
Government recognition
Section linkGovernment recognitionOriginal reviewedGovernment appreciation · Seven source letters
Each letter retains its author, date and specific context
Government appreciation · Seven source letters
Each letter retains its author, date and specific context
What this means for your family
Original letters let you understand who acknowledged which contribution and in what context.
- Source set
- Seven signed letters / instruments
- Institutions represented
- A Lok Sabha member and state ministerial offices
- Document type
- Appreciation, acknowledgement and recommendation
- Scope
- The wording of each individual instrument
What this supports
The reviewed letters record appreciation and a recommendation for consideration of collaboration. The letter register identifies authors, dates and references.
Scope & limits
Appreciation is distinct from a licence, procurement contract, signed MoU or clinical endorsement. A recommendation for consideration does not mean the proposed agreement was executed.
Two Telangana letters are undated on their face. The Andhra Pradesh Health letter’s original reference is 270/MINISTER(H,FW&ME)/2025; the handout truncates it.
Source: Recognitions bundle, physical pp2–8; cross-checked against September handout physical p13.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Government recognitionCompany-publishedAwards & nominations · Evidence of stage
Nomination and achievement-docket records are not award decisions
Awards & nominations · Evidence of stage
Nomination and achievement-docket records are not award decisions
What this means for your family
Distinguishing a nomination from an award decision keeps recognition meaningful and traceable.
- Source stage
- Nomination / submission materials located
- National Awards references
- 5050061 · 5050246 · 5050330 (handout-reported)
- Winner decision
- Not established in this review
- Other sources
- Sakshi achievement docket; named MSME file reviewed as registration
What this supports
The source materials document preparation or submission for recognition and describe the cited nomination references.
Scope & limits
A nomination, application or achievements dossier is not proof of an award being conferred. Publish an award title only with the issuer’s winner decision or award certificate.
The file named “MSME Award” contains a Udyam registration. It should appear under business registration, not awards.
Source: September handout physical p12; Drive metadata for nomination/achievement dossiers.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Government recognitionCompany-publishedIntellectual property · Application-stage claims
PCT and Indian filings must be distinguished from granted patents
Intellectual property · Application-stage claims
PCT and Indian filings must be distinguished from granted patents
What this means for your family
Application records show a stage of intellectual-property activity. Clinical value needs its own evidence.
- Lead PCT reference
- PCT/IB2023/062509 · company-reported
- September portfolio claim
- 16 applications: 13 PCT + 3 Indian
- Indian references reported
- 202541014547 · 202541057215 · 202441016027
- Independent current office match
- Not completed in this review
What this supports
The dossier and handout identify claimed patent-application references and the application-stage nature of the portfolio.
Scope & limits
A PCT application is not a granted patent or worldwide enforceable protection. Each claimed application needs applicant, title, filing/publication data and current office status.
No granted-patent or worldwide-exclusivity claim is made on this page.
Source: Evidence Dossier v2 IP section; September handout physical p15.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Government recognitionCompany-publishedTrademarks, copyright & publishing records
Registration, application and publication identifiers need separate ledgers
Trademarks, copyright & publishing records
Registration, application and publication identifiers need separate ledgers
What this means for your family
Product and publication identities help you locate the correct materials and distinguish ownership records from clinical evidence.
- Company-described assets
- Pinnacle brands, software, books and programme materials
- Public record example
- Copyright diary 30339/2024-CO/A · 28 September 2024
- Record type
- Application listing
- Trademark / copyright grants
- Full current register not checked
What this supports
An official copyright application list records a named Pinnacle artwork application. Company publications identify a wider intellectual-property and publishing portfolio.
Scope & limits
An application listing is not a granted registration. Brand usage, ISBNs and book publication do not establish device efficacy or patent rights.
Build the full title-by-title ledger from issued trademark/copyright records and ISBN notices before asserting the entire estate is registered.
Source: Official copyright application list; September handout physical p15.
Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Source publications
Section linkSource publicationsCompany-publishedGlobal Research Whitebook · Historical edition
2025 Global Edition · Company-authored framework and study summaries
Global Research Whitebook · Historical edition
2025 Global Edition · Company-authored framework and study summaries
What this means for your family
The Whitebook explains Pinnacle’s published framework and research narrative, which can guide more specific questions about sources.
- Edition
- 2025 Global Edition
- Source role
- Historical research narrative
- Authorship
- Pinnacle / named founders and consortium
- Version handling
- Upload dates do not change the edition date
What this supports
The Whitebook explains the company’s framework and its historical study narrative. It is useful for tracing the origins of claims and the research portfolio.
Scope & limits
It is not an independent issuer record. Historical scale figures, patent language, exclusivity claims and validation language need reconciliation with current originals.
Treat the title and text as a historical company publication, not as this page’s verification conclusion.
Source: Original 30-page Whitebook reviewed; study summaries pp12–21.
Reviewed: · Company-authored source; underlying claims need their own evidence.
Source publicationsCompany-publishedEvidence Dossier · Version 2.0
25 July 2026 · Controlled institutional circulation
Evidence Dossier · Version 2.0
25 July 2026 · Controlled institutional circulation
What this means for your family
The dossier brings many institutional claims together; its value is strongest when each claim remains linked to its underlying record.
- Edition
- v2.0 / v2.0-M Consortium Edition
- Issued
- 25 July 2026
- Supersedes
- July 2026 v1
- Source role
- Company-authored evidence map
What this supports
The dossier consolidates references, regulatory chronology, research summaries and source exhibits. It explicitly supersedes the earlier edition.
Scope & limits
A dossier is a map to evidence. Where it conflicts with an operative document or primary research record, the original source governs the verification entry.
Keep controlled-circulation conditions attached. July BIS application status is superseded by the September licence; research-validation wording still requires reconciliation.
Source: Original Evidence Dossier 2026, v2.0-M; 125 physical pages reviewed for relevant sections.
Reviewed: · Company-authored source; underlying claims need their own evidence.
Source publicationsCompany-publishedSeptember handout · Current source narrative
7 September 2026 · Private & confidential investor handout
September handout · Current source narrative
7 September 2026 · Private & confidential investor handout
What this means for your family
A dated company summary helps explain developments over time, including updates that supersede older publications.
- Document control
- BHCL-INV-2026-09
- Issued
- 7 September 2026
- Edition
- Final · source file V1
- Source role
- Investor narrative and evidence references
What this supports
The handout adds the September BIS licence, practitioner-report references, operational definitions and a consolidated registration and recognition narrative.
Scope & limits
Its claims must be traced to their underlying instruments. Confidential circulation, research-stage language, operational counts and letter references require careful handling before public reuse.
The full confidential handout is not republished. This page cites physical pages and surfaces the relevant evidence topics.
Source: Original 23-page handout; physical PDF pages used because printed page numbering is out of order.
Reviewed: · Company-authored source; underlying claims need their own evidence.
Source publicationsCompany-publishedBooks & parent resources · Publication records
Authorship and publication metadata read from the supplied books
Books & parent resources · Publication records
Authorship and publication metadata read from the supplied books
What this means for your family
Parent resources can support informed conversations and everyday participation alongside an individual professional plan.
- Autism — mother’s hand book
- Sreeja Reddy Saripalli · first published 2021
- Publisher printed
- India Herald Group of Publishers
- ISBN printed
- 978-93-5493-628-9
- The Voice of the Unheard
- Sreeja Reddy Saripalli named as author in the book
What this supports
The supplied books establish the publication metadata printed in those editions and provide parent-facing context for the developmental journey.
Scope & limits
A book’s publication is distinct from peer-reviewed clinical evidence or a professional qualification. The English and Telugu handbook copies show the same ISBN; separate-edition registration is not inferred.
No ISBN or publication year was established for The Voice of the Unheard in this review. The book’s internal authorship takes precedence over inconsistent PDF metadata.
Source: Supplied Books Pubished folder: English and Telugu handbook p6; The Voice of the Unheard pp1,7,132.
Reviewed: · Company-authored source; underlying claims need their own evidence.
Source publicationsCompany-publishedPinnacleAI® walkthrough · Developmental architecture
Company-authored walkthrough · AbilityScore layers and programme cadence
PinnacleAI® walkthrough · Developmental architecture
Company-authored walkthrough · AbilityScore layers and programme cadence
What this means for your family
Helps you ask how the initial assessment, daily programme and monthly review connect. Ask the care team which version is used for your child and how recommendations are reviewed by people.
- Source
- PinnacleAI® - Soveriegn WalkThrough.pdf
- Edition date
- Not established from the reviewed copy
- Length
- 61 PDF pages
- Measurement layers
- 79 abilities · 349 skills · 17 domains · 591 observations
- Programme cadence
- 7–9 daily techniques; monthly AbilityScore refresh
What this supports
The reviewed company walkthrough explicitly distinguishes abilities, skills, domains and observations. It describes the personal development kernel, daily practice, monthly reassessment and participation goals.
Scope & limits
A company-authored architecture and programme description is not independent clinical validation or a regulatory extension. Historical diagnosis, exclusivity, patent and endorsement wording is not adopted by this review. Current MD-5 and BIS originals control their respective scopes.
The two supplied filename variants are byte-identical. Source SHA-256: 0d4b81e80e8f258c4eaf84c4ed231d8b6d1c352b61411778456d5a1b8ad7321d. The original is retained in the source collection; this public record provides the relevant scope and page references.
Source: PinnacleAI® - Soveriegn WalkThrough.pdf: measurement layers p26; personal development kernel p27; daily practice p31; monthly refresh pp35,37. Physical PDF pages. Inspected 18 September 2026.
Reviewed: · Company-authored source; underlying claims need their own evidence.
Pinnacle Blooms Network is a brand of Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited. View legal identity evidence.
