Network-wide improvement claim · Evidence definition
Company outcome claim recorded with its source and calculation boundary
What this means for your family
Your child’s goals, starting point and reassessments make progress meaningful; a network headline cannot predict an individual result.
Source review conclusion
The headline outcome claim is recorded as company-reported. The supplied material does not establish a verified network-wide improvement percentage; the SAE 3000 report excludes outcome-study figures from its scope.
- Claim type
- Network-wide outcome statement
- Required basis
- Defined outcome, denominator and period
- Source status
- Company publications
- Assurance scope
- Outcome-study figures excluded from practitioner report scope
What this supports
The company publications contain a headline improvement claim and a twelve-study narrative. These identify the claim that needs a transparent evidence trail.
Scope & limits
The reviewed materials do not establish the full network-wide calculation or make it an individual outcome guarantee. Practitioner assurance over operational counts does not validate excluded outcome percentages.
A verified percentage would require the eligible population, denominator, measurement period, baseline and follow-up, assessment version, missing-data handling and reproducible calculation.
Source: Whitebook; Evidence Dossier v2; September handout; SAE 3000 scope.
Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Company publications reviewed; underlying network-wide outcome calculation not independently established.
This page summarizes the listed evidence; it is not an issuer’s verification service. A source review is separate from checking current issuer status.