Growing toward self-sufficiency. Participating in mainstream life.
Understand your child’s abilities. Build a personal plan. Connect professional support, everyday practice and monthly progress review. Explore the evidence behind PinnacleAI® and the people who put that journey into practice.
Pinnacle’s purpose is to help children grow toward self-sufficiency and participation in mainstream life, with the support and accommodations each child needs. The practical question is: “What can my child do now, what support will help next, and how will we understand progress?”
A broad view of development, organised into abilities and skills that can inform a child-specific plan. The direction is practical: what helps this child communicate, learn, manage daily routines and take part in life?
17
Developmental domains
The broad areas considered in Pinnacle’s framework.
79
Abilities
The capabilities the framework helps organise.
349
Skills
More detailed skills to connect with individual goals.
591 observations · AbilityScore® 0–1000
The company-described observation framework and score support a starting point and subsequent progress review. A child’s plan selects relevant priorities; the totals do not mean every child needs every intervention.
Pinnacle-defined architecture: company walkthrough, page 26; September handout, pages 5–6. The standards below supply classification and terminology; WHO does not define these numerical totals. An item-level domain–ability–skill crosswalk has not been independently audited in this review.
Different starting points. Meaningful everyday goals.
Families may arrive with questions about autism, ADHD, communication, sensory processing, movement, learning or other developmental concerns. Pinnacle’s stated purpose centres on the capabilities that help each child grow toward self-sufficiency and participate in mainstream life, with the support and accommodations they need.
Communication and choice
Express a need, make a choice and connect with other people.
Daily-life independence
Build participation in familiar routines and practise useful daily-living skills.
Learning and belonging
Take part in school, relationships and community with appropriate support.
These are examples of individual goals, not promised results. Professional assessment identifies the support appropriate to each child; diagnosis and medical care remain important where indicated. The licensed software’s scope is non-diagnostic developmental support for ages 0–12, not treatment of every condition.
A car needs its engine, steering and wheels to work together. In the same way, assessment, therapy, home practice and progress review need coordination. Families should not have to assemble that plan alone.
Pinnacle describes a shared developmental pathway around the child. Diagnostic information can matter for clinical care and access to support; the plan also needs to address communication, daily routines, learning, relationships and participation.
Connect professional support, home practice and participation. AI-generated conceptual illustration.
AbilityScore® · 0–1000
01 Understand the child’s abilities
Begin with what the child can do, their interests and the everyday situations where support would help. Pinnacle describes 17 developmental domains, 79 abilities and 349 skills, supported by 591 observations and an AbilityScore on a 0–1000 scale. These are different layers of its developmental framework.
For the family: A starting point the family and care team can discuss together.
Connect the observed abilities with priorities, readiness goals and a plan for this child. The dossier describes a personal development kernel: a persistent child-specific record of measurements, responses to techniques, environment and history that informs subsequent recommendations.
For the family: Clarity about what to work on next, why it matters and who will help.
Use the plan to coordinate appropriate therapies and intervention. Pinnacle describes practitioners, parents, caregivers and educators contributing to the programme; software supports professional judgement and shared goals.
For the family: People working from an agreed direction across the child’s support team.
The September handout describes 7–9 techniques selected for the child’s programme each day. Parents and other caregivers receive guidance for practice connected to the child’s current abilities and goals; the care team agrees what is appropriate.
For the family: A practical way to carry support into home routines and other everyday settings.
Record how practice goes and bring observations from the family and professionals back into review. The BIS schedule names parent, family, caregiver, therapist and clinical tracking and correction through the Fusion Module.
For the family: A plan that can respond when an activity, setting or support needs to change.
Compare the child’s present abilities with their own earlier assessments and review the next priorities. The company walkthrough describes a monthly AbilityScore refresh; the Whitebook also describes monthly review. The care team should explain the schedule and any child-specific changes.
For the family: An understandable record of change over time, connected to daily-life goals—not a judgement of the child’s worth.
Work toward communication, daily living, learning, relationships and participation in school and community. The BIS scope names seven readiness indexes, including Self Sufficiency and Mainstream Inclusion. Continue reassessment and support as needs change.
For the family: A wonderful life defined with the child and family, including the supports that make participation possible.
Review → adapt → practise → reassess. Progress review feeds the next plan. The direction is growing capability and participation, with continuing human support.
This is Pinnacle’s documented developmental-support approach. PinnacleAI® GPT-OS v1.0.0 is a non-diagnostic Class B SaMD for ages 0–12 under the supplied MD-5. A programme, score or licence does not guarantee independence, school entry or a particular outcome. Inclusion is a right; it is not conditional on a score.
Measurement versions and review cadence
The company walkthrough labels 17 domains, 79 abilities, 349 skills and 591 observations as different layers. The September 2026 handout also describes 349 skills, 17 domains and 591 observations. The earlier Whitebook uses 344 skills across six domains. The dossier acknowledges architecture changes, but a complete crosswalk between versions was not supplied. Newer counts should not be attached retrospectively to validation of an older version.
A 0–1000 score is a company-described developmental measure. It is not a diagnosis, an IQ score, a credit score or a guarantee of future independence. Review the methods and limitations alongside the number.
Pinnacle Blooms Network is a brand of Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited. Pinnacle describes a seven-stage child-development pathway connecting ability measurement, child-specific planning, integrated support, parent-guided practice and progress review toward participation and growing independence.
The documented combination brings together non-diagnostic Class B developmental-support software, a BIS scope schedule naming connected software modules, and a centre network with individually traceable source records. These documents explain the approach and its scope; each child’s plan and outcomes remain individual.
Explore six measures of Pinnacle’s reported reach, activity and resources. Each keeps its counting unit, date and evidence type visible, so scale can be understood in the context of one child’s care.
A large record system can preserve observations across a child’s developmental journey, supporting continuity and review.
Reported in the 7 September 2026 handout. Database row/event counts at 17 July 2026.
What this figure counts
Session entries, assessment observations, technique ratings and other structured events. The evidence does not identify every record as an AI-training example or establish clinical effectiveness.
The useful family question is how the experience recorded across services informs a clear plan and review for your child.
31,052,382 under the practitioner reports’ service-counting criteria, at 17 July 2026.
What this figure counts
The defined total includes assessments, screenings and parent training. It is not established as 31 million successful one-to-one therapy sessions; service volume and clinical success are separate measures.
A technique library is useful when a practitioner selects and adapts activities to a child’s goals, interests and everyday routines.
130,000 techniques: management-supplied update received 18 September 2026. The 7 September handout reports an earlier 90,000+ library.
What this figure counts
The updated repository count has not been reconciled to a dated inventory extract. The reviewed UDIN reports do not establish this figure, and technique count does not mean 130,000 separately validated interventions.
Behind each registration is a family seeking support. A family’s own goals and progress reviews remain the measure that matters to them.
792,614 unique beneficiary/family registrations under the stated criteria, at 17 July 2026.
What this figure counts
This is the defined registration measure. It is not a count of unique children with independently verified outcomes, and it does not itself measure family empowerment.
Families may connect with developmental support across borders, including through remote delivery where available.
Company-reported international reach in the July 2026 dossier, including remote delivery.
What this figure counts
Countries of family origin are different from countries with a physical Pinnacle centre. The reviewed practitioner reports do not establish this country count.
A network becomes relevant locally. Find your centre, its facility identifier and the source behind each listed document.
Network figure reported in the September handout. The practitioner-report criteria separately identify 49 operational centres at 17 July 2026.
What this figure counts
Network size, operational status and HFR identifiers are different measures. The full supplied HFR workbook is reconciled with certificate copies below; an HFR entry does not establish clinical outcomes or replace location-specific licensing.
UDIN identifies a practitioner’s report. HFR identifies a health facility. A company publication or management update supplies a stated figure. Each answers a different verification question.
Reports inspected; UDIN particulars have not been independently matched in this review. A UDIN does not expand a report’s scope or validate a clinical outcome. ICAI UDIN portal
FROM DOCUMENTS TO EVERYDAY MEANING
A clearer starting point. A connected way forward.
For a family, evidence becomes useful when it helps answer three questions: What can my child do now? What will we work on together? How will we understand what changes?
Communicating a need. Joining a family routine. Taking turns. Participating at school. These are examples of goals to discuss—not promised results. The plan should reflect your child’s abilities, preferences and support needs.
A defined intended use lets your family understand what the software is designed to support and when professional clinical evaluation is needed.
Licence number
MFG/MD/2026/000248
Issuer
State Licensing Authority · Telangana Drugs Control Administration
Licence holder
Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.
Issued
21 April 2026
Intended population
Children aged 0–12
Intended functions
Developmental ability measurement, readiness tracking, progress forecasting and adaptive therapy-plan support
What this supports
The supplied Form MD-5 licenses the listed Class B device for manufacture for sale or distribution at the specified premises. Intended users include parents, therapists, educators and caregivers supporting children aged 0–12.
Scope & limits
Applies to the named device, version, intended use and premises. It does not establish diagnostic authority, clinical effectiveness or the registration of every centre.
The operative licence reads 000248. A corrected forwarding letter also reads 000248; the older forwarding letter supplied as PinnacleAI®_SAMD_License_CL.pdf also reads 000150. The CL file is a forwarding letter, not a separate classification approval. Use the operative licence and corrected letter together.
Source: Original Form MD-5, page 1 including device annexure; supplied PinnacleAI®_SAMD_License.pdf re-inspected 18 September 2026. Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
IS 23485:2019 · Licence and scope schedule reviewed
What this means for your family
A documented software lifecycle makes quality responsibilities and the scope of developmental-support modules easier to examine.
Licence number
MD/L-2026029599
Issuer
Bureau of Indian Standards
Licence holder
Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited
Stated validity
3 September 2026 – 2 September 2029
Named developmental modules
AbilityScore mapping, Prognose, Everyday Therapy through TherapeuticAI, tracking and correction through Fusion
What this supports
The supplied BIS licence and schedule cover the specified software design, development, verification, validation, release, deployment, maintenance, support and post-market surveillance. The schedule names developmental mapping, planning, everyday practice, tracking and correction, with school, speech, motor, Study IQ, behaviour, self-sufficiency and mainstream-inclusion readiness modules across the developmental lifecycle.
Scope & limits
The licence applies to its schedule and listed address. It is not a guarantee of clinical outcomes for a child.
This September 2026 licence supersedes the “application pending” status in older company publications.
Source: Original BIS licence, page 1; scope schedule, page 2. Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
A matching legal identity helps you trace the organisation behind a credential or agreement.
CIN
U74999TG2016PTC113063
LEI
894500OJYBVC18BUDN89
Registry
Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF)
Live record checked
15 September 2026
What this supports
The official GLEIF record matches the company name and CIN. It reports entity status ACTIVE and LEI registration status ISSUED.
Scope & limits
A legal entity match establishes identity within this registry. It does not establish clinical outcomes, device permissions or current tax compliance.
Some company pages show a different CIN. The supplied change-of-name certificate and this GLEIF record support U74999TG2016PTC113063. The website references need reconciliation.
Medical device regulationOriginal reviewedApplication + issued licence
CDSCO classification · Application and licence trail
Original application reviewed · Class B is recorded in the issued MD-5
What this means for your family
Reading the application and issued licence together helps you distinguish a requested classification from the device’s licensed classification.
Source review conclusion
The January application records a proposed Class A classification. The issued MD-5 identifies PinnacleAI® GPT-OS v1.0.0 as Class B. These documents are presented in their regulatory sequence.
Reported file
MD/classification/2025/150
Reported decision date
13 April 2026
Decision source
Reported in the dossier and September handout
Application source
8 January 2026 · proposed Class A
What this supports
The issued MD-5 identifies the device as Class B. Company publications describe a preceding Central Licensing Authority classification decision.
Scope & limits
The locally available risk-classification form is an application proposing Class A, not the approved Class B decision. A classification decision is also distinct from a manufacturing licence.
The separate 13 April 2026 CAL/decision is described in company publications; its issued copy was not available for inspection. This review does not authenticate that separate decision.
Source: Risk-classification application, p1; Evidence Dossier v2, pp23–24; September handout, physical pp1 and 9; operative MD-5, p1. Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Application and issued MD-5 inspected; separate issued CAL not inspected.
Application record in the route to the issued MD-5
What this means for your family
The application explains part of the regulatory journey; the issued licence is the document to use for the resulting permission.
Application reference
MFG/MD/2026/189231
Applicant
Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited
Form dated
17 April 2026
Fee payment shown
16 April 2026
What this supports
The reviewed application records the applicant’s request for a Class B manufacturing licence and the stated device particulars.
Scope & limits
MD-3 is an application, not an additional granted licence. The permission is established by the operative MD-5 and its conditions.
The signed form date and the preceding fee-payment date are recorded separately. A portal-email screenshot in the supplied Pinnacle folder also shows submission on 16 April and application approval on 20 April 2026; the issued MD-5 remains the licence evidence.
Medical device quality-management system · ISO 13485:2016
What this means for your family
Quality-management evidence helps you ask how software development, changes and corrective action are controlled.
Certificate
3050251115129MD
Certification body
QRO Certification LLP
Certified
25 November 2025
Stated expiry
24 November 2028
What this supports
The supplied certificate covers the named company’s quality-management scope for the design, development, deployment, maintenance and support of the specified SaMD.
Scope & limits
Certification applies to the certificate’s system scope. Historic “diagnostic mapping” wording does not extend the later MD-5’s non-diagnostic intended use. Accreditation-chain and live certificate status have not been independently checked.
Information-security management system · ISO/IEC 27001:2022
What this means for your family
Information-security evidence helps you ask how sensitive developmental information is managed within the certified scope.
Certificate
305025120207IS
Certification body
QRO Certification LLP
Certified
2 December 2025
Stated expiry
1 December 2028
What this supports
The original certificate covers information-security management for the listed SaMD platforms, cloud operations, cybersecurity, data protection and support.
Scope & limits
Certification does not guarantee zero breaches or cover every process outside the declared scope. Current certificate status and the accreditation chain remain separate checks.
The original reads 305025120207IS (letters I and S); some secondary text uses a digit 1. First surveillance date: 1 December 2026.
The legal entity behind the supplied core credentials
What this means for your family
A documented name history connects today’s organisation with credentials issued under earlier names.
CIN
U74999TG2016PTC113063
Issuer
Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad · MCA
Name-change certificate
18 May 2017
Current name on certificate
Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited
What this supports
The certificate records the change from Bharath Diagnostics Labs Private Limited to Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited. The CIN agrees with the live GLEIF record.
Scope & limits
A historic incorporation/name-change certificate establishes the recorded identity event. Current MCA filings, directors and compliance require current MCA records.
Use this identity consistently across the main website, referral portals and credential records.
DIPP8651 · Issued recognition with an updated-certificate check due
What this means for your family
Startup recognition explains a business credential. Your child’s care plan should be evaluated using its own clinical and service evidence.
Recognition number
DIPP8651
Issued
6 September 2017
Date printed on older certificate
Valid up to 21 November 2026
Official historical corroboration
Startup India list · 3 November 2023
What this supports
The supplied recognition certificate and an official historical Startup India list identify the company as a recognised startup.
Scope & limits
Recognition is distinct from a tax-exemption certificate, healthcare approval or an award. Current eligibility and status should be read from the updated certificate and applicable rules.
The older certificate uses a ₹100 crore threshold. General recognition rules changed in February 2026 to ₹200 crore; Startup India asks existing startups to download updated certificates. Do not infer current ineligibility from the old threshold.
Source: COR_DIPP8651.pdf, p1; Startup India list dated 3 November 2023, row 3630. Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
UDYAM-TS-20-0015132 · Business-registration record
What this means for your family
Enterprise registration makes the business identity and classification traceable.
Registration
UDYAM-TS-20-0015132
Registered
9 June 2021
Later snapshot
Small · FY 2025–26; classification dated 1 April 2025
Snapshot printed
29 November 2025
What this supports
The later supplied Udyam record identifies the company and records a Small enterprise classification for FY 2025–26.
Scope & limits
This is enterprise registration, not an MSME award or a clinical accreditation. Enterprise classification can change; the displayed snapshot is not a live September 2026 confirmation.
An older 2021 copy described the enterprise as Micro. Its file name included “MSME Award”; neither that name nor the older category should be used as the current claim. Banking and financial annexures are withheld.
Source: Udyam Certificate 2026 full.pdf reviewed through Drive; the file name does not change the 2025 print date. Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Original 2017 REG-06 reviewed · Historical registration with the printed legal and trade names
What this means for your family
The printed legal and trade names help families and institutions match the supplier on invoices and records.
Source review conclusion
The supplied certificate establishes the registration details printed in 2017. Its former legal name is retained exactly as issued, alongside the company’s documented name-change history.
Document
GST REG-06
Issued
9 December 2017
Legal name on supplied copy
Bharath Diagnostics Labs Private Limited
Trade name on supplied copy
Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited
What this supports
The 2017 GST certificate records registration under the names printed on that document. The MCA name-change certificate supplies part of the corporate-name history.
Scope & limits
The original retains the former legal name. A current GST taxpayer record or amended certificate is needed before describing the current name and registration status as matched. GST registration does not establish clinical quality.
Full tax identifiers and director annexures are excluded from this display. Use the current company-provided GSTIN in the official lookup.
Corporate PAN card inspected · Identifier withheld from display
What this means for your family
The inspected corporate identity document adds an identity check while keeping the tax identifier out of public display.
Entity on card
Bharath Healthcare Laboratories Private Limited
Date of incorporation shown
22 November 2016
Document type
Corporate Permanent Account Number card
Access
Identifier and QR withheld
What this supports
The supplied corporate PAN card identifies the company and its incorporation date.
Scope & limits
PAN supports tax identity. It does not establish current tax compliance or clinical authorisation. Live PAN verification has its own matching-information and OTP requirements.
No PAN number is derived from the GSTIN or exposed in this page.
Centre registrationsWorkbook & certificate copies reviewed
ABDM / NHA · Health Facility Registry
All 52 workbook centres · 53 distinct HFR IDs across both source sets
What this means for your family
A facility identifier gives you a specific record to ask about when checking the centre your family will visit.
Registry
National Health Authority · Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission
Workbook
52 centre rows; 52 unique HFR IDs
Certificate copies
28 unique HFR IDs from 29 certificate entries
Source reconciliation
27 IDs in both sources; 25 additional workbook IDs; one certificate-only ID
Combined inventory
53 distinct HFR identifiers; not a count of confirmed active centres
What this supports
The complete supplied centre workbook lists 52 centres, addresses and HFR identifiers. Twenty-seven IDs correspond to the inspected certificate collection. The combined register preserves all 53 identifiers and labels the source and certificate-review level of each entry.
Scope & limits
Workbook entries are company-supplied, not live government registry checks. The RS column is undefined; its ACTIVE/INACTIVE flags do not establish current operational or HFR status. HFR is not clinical-outcome certification or a replacement for local permissions. A matching ID does not independently reconcile current addresses.
The workbook’s Tirupati entry is IN2810065148. The separately inspected IN2810053847 certificate is retained as an additional record; replacement, cancellation or address equivalence has not been established. Duplicate Srikakulam certificate copies count once.
Source: All Centers With HFR.xlsx, sheet All Centers With HFR, rows 2–53 (reviewed 18 September 2026); original recognitions bundle, physical pp67–95. Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
29 Section 51 certificate copies described in the source collection
What this means for your family
District summaries help locate relevant institution documents; match the individual certificate to the exact premises.
Legal framework
RPwD Act, 2016 · Section 51
Departments
District welfare / disability-empowerment authorities
Source grouping
Eight districts · Telangana and Andhra Pradesh
Current-status basis
Certificate dates and renewals require centre-level review
What this supports
The source collection contains district-specific institution-registration copies. Four selected originals are documented below; the September handout groups the broader collection.
Scope & limits
These are separate institution records, not one nationwide DDEW licence. A network count should not be treated as proof that all centres hold current registrations.
The handout groups 19 copies within stated 2027–2030 date ranges and 10 on a renewal calendar. Current renewal originals and issuer status must be checked individually.
Section 51 registration · Named institution and location
What this means for your family
This document gives families an institution-specific registration to match against the address and service being considered.
Issuer
District Welfare Officer · Ranga Reddy
Certificate reference
Not entered on supplied copy
Stated validity
8 January 2025 – 7 January 2030
Scope
The institution and address named on the certificate
What this supports
The supplied certificate records the named institution’s district registration under Section 51 of the RPwD Act.
Scope & limits
The record covers its listed institution and location. Face-date validity does not confirm that no later change, suspension or cancellation has occurred.
The certificate-number field is blank in the original; no number has been invented.
Section 51 registration · Named institution and location
What this means for your family
This document gives families an institution-specific registration to match against the address and service being considered.
Issuer
Hyderabad District · Disability Empowerment Department
Certificate reference
32 of 2024
Stated validity
17 December 2024 – 31 March 2027
Scope
The institution and address named on the certificate
What this supports
The supplied certificate records the named institution’s district registration under Section 51 of the RPwD Act.
Scope & limits
The record covers its listed institution and location. Face-date validity does not confirm that no later change, suspension or cancellation has occurred.
Section 51 registration · Named institution and location
What this means for your family
This document gives families an institution-specific registration to match against the address and service being considered.
Issuer
District Welfare Officer · Nizamabad
Certificate reference
05 of 2024
Stated validity
5 January 2024 – 4 January 2027
Scope
The institution and address named on the certificate
What this supports
The supplied certificate records the named institution’s district registration under Section 51 of the RPwD Act.
Scope & limits
The record covers its listed institution and location. Face-date validity does not confirm that no later change, suspension or cancellation has occurred.
Centre registrationsOriginal reviewedHistorical · ended 30 Oct 2024
Nellore · Historical district registration
Original certificate reviewed · Printed validity ended 30 October 2024
What this means for your family
The historical record makes the earlier registration period traceable and identifies the renewal needed to establish current coverage.
Source review conclusion
Certificate 06 of 2023 documents registration for the stated Nellore institution during 31 October 2023–30 October 2024. It is retained as historical evidence.
Issuer
Welfare of Differently Abled & Senior Citizens · SPSR Nellore
Certificate
06 of 2023
Stated validity
31 October 2023 – 30 October 2024
Renewal
Not established by the reviewed original
What this supports
The supplied historical certificate records the named institution’s registration for the printed period.
Scope & limits
The face date has passed. This review does not establish the absence of a renewal, but cannot present the historical copy as current.
A renewal was not supplied for inspection. This historical certificate is not presented as evidence of current registration.
Source: Recognitions bundle, physical p117. Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Original inspected; printed validity period has ended. Current renewal not established.
SAE 3000 · Institutional claims as at 17 July 2026
What this means for your family
A clearly defined assurance scope helps you distinguish institutional-record checks from evidence about a child’s clinical outcome.
Practitioner
NPSY & Co., Chartered Accountants
Firm registration
013580S
Report dated
3 September 2026
UDIN
26200027GMBLXU4868
What this supports
The report records limited assurance over its defined Statement of Institutional Claims using the Board-adopted criteria specified in the report.
Scope & limits
Limited assurance is different from reasonable assurance. Outcome-study figures, ratings and financial statements fall outside the described scope; the report does not independently validate clinical efficacy.
The report is marked private/confidential and restricted-use. Its full text is not republished here; permitted circulation should be confirmed before a public evidence-room release.
Source: Original seven-page SAE 3000 report; September handout physical p14 provides a secondary summary. Reviewed: · Report inspected; UDIN not independently matched in this review.
SRS 4400 · Agreed procedures on institutional records
What this means for your family
Specified factual checks make the counting method more understandable; they do not supply an assurance opinion on outcomes.
Practitioner
NPSY & Co., Chartered Accountants
Report dated
3 September 2026
UDIN
26200027HCNFEI9138
Subject date
17 July 2026
What this supports
The report records factual findings from the specified agreed procedures on institutional claims and supporting records.
Scope & limits
An agreed-upon-procedures report is not an assurance opinion. Readers need the complete procedures, criteria and findings to assess its meaning. It does not establish clinical outcomes.
Restricted-use source. A UDIN lookup authenticates document particulars; it does not expand the report’s scope.
2.7 billion+ reported structured records · dated counts with defined units
What this means for your family
Consistent records can support continuity across a child’s journey. Ask to see your child’s own goals and progress reviews alongside network-level numbers.
Measurement date
17 July 2026, as described in the September handout
Therapy services reported
31,052,382
Operational centres reported
49 under the stated four-condition test
People metric reported
792,614 unique beneficiary / family registrations
Structured platform records reported
2,700,000,000+ observed database row/event counts
Counting unit
Discrete structured record: session entry, assessment observation, technique rating, sensor event or equivalent mapped field
Technique repository update
130,000 entries; management-supplied 18 September 2026. Earlier 7 September handout: 90,000+ techniques.
International reach reported
Families from 70+ countries of origin, including remote delivery; company-reported
Network reported
70+ centres including network stages distinct from the report’s operational-centre test
What this supports
The September handout reports 2.7 billion+ structured platform records and connects dated operational counts to specified procedures and Board-adopted criteria. It separately describes a 70+ network figure. The 2.5 billion floor assertion and 2.7 billion observed row-count finding have different reporting roles.
Scope & limits
Therapy services include assessments, screenings and parent training under the report’s criteria; they are not all one-to-one therapy sessions. Beneficiary/family registrations are not a count of unique children. Network and operational centres use different definitions. Platform records are not unique children, independent clinical-trial observations or verified, deduplicated AI-training examples. Volume alone does not establish model performance, clinical effectiveness or a worldwide size ranking. The 130,000 technique update has no inspected inventory extract; neither practitioner report establishes that updated count or the 70+ countries claim.
The July dossier used a 2.5 billion+ floor and retired earlier 2.7 billion wording. The September handout subsequently publishes 2.7 billion+ observed row counts. Limited assurance over the 2.5 billion floor is distinct from factual findings without an assurance opinion on the 2.7 billion row count. The 70+ network and 49 operational-centre figures also use different definitions.
Source: Company handout, 7 September 2026, physical pp3, 14–15; July dossier pp6, 74, 76, 79, 124. Restricted practitioner sources inspected: SRS 4400 pp2–3; SAE 3000 pp3–4 and criteria p6. Cutoff 17 July 2026. Technique count: management update received 18 September 2026; earlier 90,000+ in September handout pp5, 7, 15. Countries of family origin: July dossier pp75–76; network definition pp75–77. Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Development and preliminary psychometric characterization
What this means for your family
A methods paper lets practitioners examine how a measurement approach was developed and where further validation is needed.
Repository
Zenodo
Published
9 April 2026
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.19482123
Publication type
Preprint · preliminary evidence
What this supports
The public record describes the construction of AbilityScore and preliminary operational psychometric findings. The authors identify formal validation as planned.
Scope & limits
Operational inter-rater reliability is not completed external concurrent validity. A repository deposit does not establish journal peer review or independent replication.
Read reported measurement properties within the instrument version, methods and population stated by the authors.
Research & outcomesOriginal reviewedStudy protocol
AbilityScore · External-validation protocol
Original protocol reviewed · Version 2.1 sets out planned validation methods
What this means for your family
A published protocol makes the proposed research question and methods visible before a completed result is claimed.
Source review conclusion
The reviewed source is protocol BHCL-VAL-2026-001, version 2.1. It describes a proposed external-validation study and sample plan; completed validation results are not claimed.
The deposited protocol describes planned concurrent-validity, test–retest and minimal-clinically-important-difference research, including comparator instruments.
Scope & limits
This record is a protocol preprint, not completed results. It does not establish that the planned recruitment, testing or external validation has been completed.
Repository metadata was rechecked on 18 September 2026 and continues to identify the source as a protocol. A completed study report with methods, results and limitations would support a later conclusion.
Source: Original Zenodo record 19482476 and its metadata, retrieved 15 September 2026. Reviewed: · Scope rechecked: 18 September 2026 · Primary protocol and repository metadata reviewed; completed comparator validation is not established.
Study-by-study sources, populations and limitations
What this means for your family
Study-level detail helps families and referring professionals see which children and outcomes a research statement actually concerns.
Source type
Company-authored research portfolio
Summary editions
2025 Whitebook; July 2026 dossier; September 2026 handout
Evidence design
Varies by study; operator-network research
Review boundary
Portfolio mapped; full independent re-analysis not performed
What this supports
The source publications describe twelve research topics across measurement, therapy, home practice, equity and participation. The study index identifies the populations and available original report links.
Scope & limits
Small study cohorts cannot be replaced by cumulative network-service totals. Journal peer review, independent replication and ethics approval require their own documents. Findings apply to the populations and methods studied.
School-entry findings must remain qualified to children meeting readiness criteria; the parent-led generalisation report notes limitations and a non-significant home-adherence correlation.
Source: Whitebook pp12–21; Evidence Dossier v2 study register; September handout physical p8; company-hosted study reports. Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Company outcome claim recorded with its source and calculation boundary
What this means for your family
Your child’s goals, starting point and reassessments make progress meaningful; a network headline cannot predict an individual result.
Source review conclusion
The headline outcome claim is recorded as company-reported. The supplied material does not establish a verified network-wide improvement percentage; the SAE 3000 report excludes outcome-study figures from its scope.
Claim type
Network-wide outcome statement
Required basis
Defined outcome, denominator and period
Source status
Company publications
Assurance scope
Outcome-study figures excluded from practitioner report scope
What this supports
The company publications contain a headline improvement claim and a twelve-study narrative. These identify the claim that needs a transparent evidence trail.
Scope & limits
The reviewed materials do not establish the full network-wide calculation or make it an individual outcome guarantee. Practitioner assurance over operational counts does not validate excluded outcome percentages.
A verified percentage would require the eligible population, denominator, measurement period, baseline and follow-up, assessment version, missing-data handling and reproducible calculation.
Each letter retains its author, date and specific context
What this means for your family
Original letters let you understand who acknowledged which contribution and in what context.
Source set
Seven signed letters / instruments
Institutions represented
A Lok Sabha member and state ministerial offices
Document type
Appreciation, acknowledgement and recommendation
Scope
The wording of each individual instrument
What this supports
The reviewed letters record appreciation and a recommendation for consideration of collaboration. The letter register identifies authors, dates and references.
Scope & limits
Appreciation is distinct from a licence, procurement contract, signed MoU or clinical endorsement. A recommendation for consideration does not mean the proposed agreement was executed.
Two Telangana letters are undated on their face. The Andhra Pradesh Health letter’s original reference is 270/MINISTER(H,FW&ME)/2025; the handout truncates it.
Source: Recognitions bundle, physical pp2–8; cross-checked against September handout physical p13. Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
Nomination and achievement-docket records are not award decisions
What this means for your family
Distinguishing a nomination from an award decision keeps recognition meaningful and traceable.
Source stage
Nomination / submission materials located
National Awards references
5050061 · 5050246 · 5050330 (handout-reported)
Winner decision
Not established in this review
Other sources
Sakshi achievement docket; named MSME file reviewed as registration
What this supports
The source materials document preparation or submission for recognition and describe the cited nomination references.
Scope & limits
A nomination, application or achievements dossier is not proof of an award being conferred. Publish an award title only with the issuer’s winner decision or award certificate.
The file named “MSME Award” contains a Udyam registration. It should appear under business registration, not awards.
Source: September handout physical p12; Drive metadata for nomination/achievement dossiers. Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
PCT and Indian filings must be distinguished from granted patents
What this means for your family
Application records show a stage of intellectual-property activity. Clinical value needs its own evidence.
Lead PCT reference
PCT/IB2023/062509 · company-reported
September portfolio claim
16 applications: 13 PCT + 3 Indian
Indian references reported
202541014547 · 202541057215 · 202441016027
Independent current office match
Not completed in this review
What this supports
The dossier and handout identify claimed patent-application references and the application-stage nature of the portfolio.
Scope & limits
A PCT application is not a granted patent or worldwide enforceable protection. Each claimed application needs applicant, title, filing/publication data and current office status.
No granted-patent or worldwide-exclusivity claim is made on this page.
Registration, application and publication identifiers need separate ledgers
What this means for your family
Product and publication identities help you locate the correct materials and distinguish ownership records from clinical evidence.
Company-described assets
Pinnacle brands, software, books and programme materials
Public record example
Copyright diary 30339/2024-CO/A · 28 September 2024
Record type
Application listing
Trademark / copyright grants
Full current register not checked
What this supports
An official copyright application list records a named Pinnacle artwork application. Company publications identify a wider intellectual-property and publishing portfolio.
Scope & limits
An application listing is not a granted registration. Brand usage, ISBNs and book publication do not establish device efficacy or patent rights.
Build the full title-by-title ledger from issued trademark/copyright records and ISBN notices before asserting the entire estate is registered.
Source: Official copyright application list; September handout physical p15. Reviewed: · Current issuer or registry status: not independently confirmed.
2025 Global Edition · Company-authored framework and study summaries
What this means for your family
The Whitebook explains Pinnacle’s published framework and research narrative, which can guide more specific questions about sources.
Edition
2025 Global Edition
Source role
Historical research narrative
Authorship
Pinnacle / named founders and consortium
Version handling
Upload dates do not change the edition date
What this supports
The Whitebook explains the company’s framework and its historical study narrative. It is useful for tracing the origins of claims and the research portfolio.
Scope & limits
It is not an independent issuer record. Historical scale figures, patent language, exclusivity claims and validation language need reconciliation with current originals.
Treat the title and text as a historical company publication, not as this page’s verification conclusion.
25 July 2026 · Controlled institutional circulation
What this means for your family
The dossier brings many institutional claims together; its value is strongest when each claim remains linked to its underlying record.
Edition
v2.0 / v2.0-M Consortium Edition
Issued
25 July 2026
Supersedes
July 2026 v1
Source role
Company-authored evidence map
What this supports
The dossier consolidates references, regulatory chronology, research summaries and source exhibits. It explicitly supersedes the earlier edition.
Scope & limits
A dossier is a map to evidence. Where it conflicts with an operative document or primary research record, the original source governs the verification entry.
Keep controlled-circulation conditions attached. July BIS application status is superseded by the September licence; research-validation wording still requires reconciliation.
Source: Original Evidence Dossier 2026, v2.0-M; 125 physical pages reviewed for relevant sections. Reviewed: · Company-authored source; underlying claims need their own evidence.
7 September 2026 · Private & confidential investor handout
What this means for your family
A dated company summary helps explain developments over time, including updates that supersede older publications.
Document control
BHCL-INV-2026-09
Issued
7 September 2026
Edition
Final · source file V1
Source role
Investor narrative and evidence references
What this supports
The handout adds the September BIS licence, practitioner-report references, operational definitions and a consolidated registration and recognition narrative.
Scope & limits
Its claims must be traced to their underlying instruments. Confidential circulation, research-stage language, operational counts and letter references require careful handling before public reuse.
The full confidential handout is not republished. This page cites physical pages and surfaces the relevant evidence topics.
Source: Original 23-page handout; physical PDF pages used because printed page numbering is out of order. Reviewed: · Company-authored source; underlying claims need their own evidence.
Authorship and publication metadata read from the supplied books
What this means for your family
Parent resources can support informed conversations and everyday participation alongside an individual professional plan.
Autism — mother’s hand book
Sreeja Reddy Saripalli · first published 2021
Publisher printed
India Herald Group of Publishers
ISBN printed
978-93-5493-628-9
The Voice of the Unheard
Sreeja Reddy Saripalli named as author in the book
What this supports
The supplied books establish the publication metadata printed in those editions and provide parent-facing context for the developmental journey.
Scope & limits
A book’s publication is distinct from peer-reviewed clinical evidence or a professional qualification. The English and Telugu handbook copies show the same ISBN; separate-edition registration is not inferred.
No ISBN or publication year was established for The Voice of the Unheard in this review. The book’s internal authorship takes precedence over inconsistent PDF metadata.
Source: Supplied Books Pubished folder: English and Telugu handbook p6; The Voice of the Unheard pp1,7,132. Reviewed: · Company-authored source; underlying claims need their own evidence.
Company-authored walkthrough · AbilityScore layers and programme cadence
What this means for your family
Helps you ask how the initial assessment, daily programme and monthly review connect. Ask the care team which version is used for your child and how recommendations are reviewed by people.
The reviewed company walkthrough explicitly distinguishes abilities, skills, domains and observations. It describes the personal development kernel, daily practice, monthly reassessment and participation goals.
Scope & limits
A company-authored architecture and programme description is not independent clinical validation or a regulatory extension. Historical diagnosis, exclusivity, patent and endorsement wording is not adopted by this review. Current MD-5 and BIS originals control their respective scopes.
The two supplied filename variants are byte-identical. Source SHA-256: 0d4b81e80e8f258c4eaf84c4ed231d8b6d1c352b61411778456d5a1b8ad7321d. The original is retained in the source collection; this public record provides the relevant scope and page references.
Source: PinnacleAI® - Soveriegn WalkThrough.pdf: measurement layers p26; personal development kernel p27; daily practice p31; monthly refresh pp35,37. Physical PDF pages. Inspected 18 September 2026. Reviewed: · Company-authored source; underlying claims need their own evidence.
Ask how your child’s starting abilities, goals and progress will be measured, when the plan will be reviewed and how practice carries into home and school.
Session entries, assessment observations, technique ratings and other platform events can preserve a record over time. The practical question is how that history helps the care team review your child’s plan.
Volume describes the size of the record system. Useful decisions also depend on data quality, consistent measurement, appropriate use and professional judgement.
This is not a count of unique children, independent clinical-trial observations or verified AI-training examples. A large count alone does not prove clinical effectiveness.
Observations become useful when people can review them together. AI-generated conceptual illustration.Why do some Pinnacle sources say 2.5 billion+ and others 2.7 billion+?
The July dossier used a 2.5 billion+ floor and retired earlier 2.7 billion wording. The September handout subsequently reports 2.7 billion+ observed row counts. The source review distinguishes the 2.5 billion floor assertion in limited assurance from the 2.7 billion factual row-count finding under agreed procedures. Those procedures do not provide an assurance opinion.
These are dated measures with different reporting roles. Neither should be described as an audited count of AI-training examples. Restricted practitioner reports are not republished here.
An issued licence defines the software’s intended use. Quality records describe how the system is managed. The BIS schedule connects those processes to a broader set of developmental-support modules.
The schedule names software development, deployment and maintenance, plus ability mapping, parent-guided practice, progress correction and readiness modules.
Parents are explicitly included in the licensed intended use.
“The software is intended to assist parents, therapists, educators, and caregivers by providing developmental ability measurement, readiness tracking, progress forecasting, and adaptive therapy-plan support for children aged 0–12 years.”
MD-5 MFG/MD/2026/000248 · intended-use annexure · 21 April 2026
Bring guided developmental practice into everyday life. The licensed intended use names parents and caregivers alongside therapists and educators. Families have an explicit role in using the software’s developmental-support functions, with goals and guidance appropriate to their child.
Pinnacle’s Everyday Therapy programme and Fusion Module describe how that participation connects with daily practice, feedback and professional review. The BIS schedule names parent, family and caregiver tracking and correction as part of the connected developmental journey.
The intended use identifies whom the software assists and what it supports. It does not confer professional therapist credentials, register a home as a therapy centre or replace appropriate clinical care. A worldwide exclusivity claim is not established by these documents.
“for the full developmental lifecycle of children.”
The schedule names AbilityScore, Prognose®, the Everyday Therapy Programme through TherapeuticAI®, the Fusion tracking and correction module, and seven readiness indexes—including Self Sufficiency and Mainstream Inclusion.
This is the named quality-system and software-module scope. The MD-5 records the device’s four intended functions: ability measurement, readiness tracking, progress forecasting and adaptive therapy-plan support. Both documents retain their named software and premises. The MD-5 intended population is ages 0–12; individual outcomes remain subject to the child’s circumstances and support.
Read the full software and developmental-module scope
“Design, development, verification and validation, release, deployment, maintenance, technical support and post-market surveillance of Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), including Pinnacle AI GPT-OS™, and Developmental Support Software (Non-Diagnostic), including developmental ability mapping (Ability Score), prognostic engine Prognose®, Clinical Intervention Every Day Therapy Programme through Therapeutic AI®, Parent, Family, Caregiver, Therapist, Clinical Tracking and Correction Fusion Module, School Readiness, Speech Readiness, Motor Readiness, Study IQ Readiness, Behavior Readiness, Self Sufficiency Index, Mainstream Inclusion Index, 7 readiness indexing and associated digital developmental support modules for the full developmental lifecycle of children.”
BIS MD/L-2026029599 · schedule page 2 · line breaks normalised
Parents, therapists, educators and caregivers are the intended users. The licensed software supports developmental work; it does not diagnose, approve every therapy centre or guarantee a child’s outcome.
Class B is a risk classification under India’s rules. US FDA Class II is a different jurisdiction’s classification; neither is a universal ranking of quality or clinical superiority. CDSCO · Medical Devices Rules
Search the supplied facility and district records. Match the exact premises before relying on a document; a network credential does not cover every centre automatically.
All 52 workbook rows are included. Twenty-seven IDs match the certificate collection; 25 are additional workbook entries. One further Tirupati certificate makes 53 distinct IDs across the two sources. These totals do not establish the number of currently operating centres.
53 HFR identifiers · 8 district summaries
HFR identifierWorkbook + certificate copy
Ananthapuram
HFR identifier
IN2810053167
Printed date / period
14 Apr 2026
Source
All Centers With HFR.xlsx · row 49
2nd Cross Rd, opp. to SIU church, beside BABY Hospital, Ashoknagar, Sai Nagar, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh Postcode column: 515001
Workbook RS: ACTIVE (meaning undefined; not current registry status). Certificate copy also inspected.
No - 11-14-321/3, Building Name - K Square, 3rd Floor New Siri Nagar Colony Beside Croma store, above Raymond Store, near L.B Nagar Circle, Hyderabad, Telangana 500074 Postcode column: 500074
Workbook RS: ACTIVE (meaning undefined; not current registry status). Workbook-listed identifier; certificate not in the inspected collection.
All 52 workbook centres and 53 distinct HFR identifiers across both source sets are available above. Eight district summaries describe 29 certificate copies; four district originals were individually inspected. Similar names are not treated as an address match. Full HFR register · Full district register
INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE. PERSONAL GOALS.
Structured for understanding. Designed for connected care.
Four distinct standards help explain the architecture: health information, functioning and participation, interventions, and clinical terminology. Their value depends on how accurately they are implemented.
A common classification and clinical terminology for recording, comparing and aggregating health information. It gives health-related records a consistent reference language.
Pinnacle’s dossier describes ICD-11 reference alignment; this does not make the software diagnostic.
A framework covering body functions and structures, activities, participation and environmental context. It helps keep daily life and the support needed to participate in view.
Pinnacle’s handout and dossier describe ICF mappings. The dossier’s b-code examples describe body functions; activity, participation and environment need their own relevant codes.
A classification for recording and analysing health interventions through their target, action and means. It can help describe what intervention is delivered in a consistent way.
Pinnacle’s dossier describes ICHI intervention coding within its architecture.
A detailed clinical terminology that represents information through concepts, descriptions and relationships. It supports consistent meaning in electronic clinical records.
Pinnacle’s dossier describes SNOMED CT terminology alignment. SNOMED International is the responsible organisation.
Pinnacle’s framework, connected to international languages
The Evidence Dossier describes mappings to ICD-11, ICF and ICHI, alongside SNOMED CT and LOINC terminology and HL7 FHIR representations. These are company-described architecture and mapping claims. Correctly implemented mappings can support more consistent records, exchange and analysis across settings.
The reviewed evidence does not include a complete item-by-item mapping audit or implementation-conformance report. Classification alignment does not establish WHO, UN or SNOMED endorsement, validate the developmental score, or expand the MD-5 intended use.
A population-scale ambition. One child’s life at the centre.
Pinnacle describes a connected developmental-support architecture designed for wider deployment: a common framework, a persistent child-specific record, guided daily practice and human review. Its potential value at scale is continuity—helping families and professionals work from the same developmental direction across home, therapy and school.
What makes “sovereign-ready” and “world-ready” meaningful?
For a health system, sovereign readiness means demonstrable control over data and operations under its own governance requirements. International readiness also needs validated mappings, appropriate local language and workflows, applicable regulatory permissions, and evidence of safe, useful performance in that setting.
Validate the mappings and test information exchange with the systems that will actually use it.
Capacity and real-world value
Test deployment performance, accessibility and child-centred outcomes in the intended population and setting.
The reviewed MD-5 and BIS scope establish specific regulatory and quality-system foundations. Reported network activity and information-security records add context. Together they support examining the deployment proposition; they are not a sovereign-grade certification or authorisation to operate in every country.
How to interpret reported data volume
The reported 2.7 billion+ structured records count database rows and events. They do not establish a nationally representative population, verified AI-training volume or population-level clinical effectiveness.
Pinnacle’s stated mission has practical connections to the UN Sustainable Development Goals: access to support, early learning, inclusion and accountable collaboration.
These are mission connections, not measured SDG achievements, an official UN partnership or UN endorsement. Each child’s right to inclusion remains independent of a readiness score.
GLOBAL PRINCIPLES. PINNACLE’S DOCUMENTED APPROACH.
Independent guidance explains the importance of monitoring, caregiver participation, coordinated support and inclusion. These organisations do not endorse or evaluate Pinnacle through the references below.
Pinnacle’s licensed non-diagnostic software includes ability measurement and readiness tracking. This CDC reference does not validate AbilityScore as a screening test.
NICE recommends coordinated multidisciplinary support and developmentally appropriate parent, carer or teacher involvement for autistic children and young people.
Pinnacle describes integrated therapies and regular plan review. Families can ask how professionals share goals and who coordinates their child’s support.
Pinnacle’s pathway works toward communication, daily living and participation. Readiness goals do not determine a child’s right to education or inclusion.
Different organisations address diagnosis, assessment, digital treatment, integrated services or provider software. A useful comparison starts with the job each is designed to do.
Non-diagnostic developmental-support software with an issued MD-5, a BIS schedule naming connected developmental modules, and a company-described seven-stage care pathway. For families, the important connection is between measurement, a plan, everyday practice and review.
Prescription software for attention function measured by computer testing in children aged 8–17 with specified ADHD presentations, within a therapeutic programme.
Its published model combines diagnostics, medical care, ABA, developmental therapies and mental-health counselling, involving family, home, school and community.
Integrated child-development care exists internationally. Compare actual coordination, local availability and evidence for the services your child needs.
This is a targeted review of five examples, not an exhaustive worldwide census or a head-to-head effectiveness study. It establishes no overall winner, cross-country regulatory equivalence, largest-dataset ranking or global exclusivity.
The better comparison question
“Which combination of measurement, professional support, home practice, progress review and participation goals is actually available for my child—and can I inspect the evidence?”
Each conclusion reflects the documents inspected. Historical certificates, study protocols and company-reported claims are identified precisely, so you can see what each source establishes.
Licence and registration copies: read their stated scope
Original licence and registration copies are reviewed by named entity, activity, reference and printed dates.
Evidence scope: Current suspension, cancellation, renewal or amendment status requires a dated issuer check. Only exact live registry matches receive the registry badge.
Outcome claims: keep the calculation boundary visible
The headline improvement claim is recorded as company-reported. No verified network-wide percentage is concluded from this document set.
Evidence scope: The SAE 3000 scope excludes outcome-study figures. A defined denominator and reproducible calculation are required to evaluate the headline claim.
Centre evidence: match each document to its premises
All 52 workbook centres are included. Across the workbook and inspected certificate copies, 53 distinct HFR identifiers are retained. Eight district summaries and four individually inspected district originals remain separate.
Evidence scope: Workbook RS flags do not establish operational or HFR status. Nellore’s district certificate period ended on 30 October 2024. The additional Tirupati certificate is retained without assuming replacement or cancellation.
Report particulars and scope are recorded. Restricted full reports are not republished here.
Evidence scope: The reports’ circulation restrictions remain attached. A UDIN match authenticates particulars and does not enlarge a report’s assurance scope.
18 September 2026 · Purpose, pathway and imagery: added the documented AbilityScore layers, daily practice and monthly review cycle, original-source regulatory scope, classification and SDG context, plus three clearly labelled Pinnacle World illustrations. Improved phone and tablet layouts.
18 September 2026 · Section descriptions and identity: connected the brand and legal entity, added section links and a terminology guide, and matched structured page descriptions to the visible evidence.
18 September 2026 · Complete HFR inventory and statistics: added all 52 supplied workbook centres, reconciled 53 distinct HFR IDs across source sets, and linked six headline statistics to definitions and source records.
18 September 2026 · Family meaning and global context: added family relevance to all 33 records, dated data-scale definitions, the distinct MD-3/MD-5/BIS scopes, international guidance and five sourced global comparisons. Enabled public indexing and expanded matching structured data.
18 September 2026 · Review conclusions: rechecked the flagged source material; separated original review from historical validity, application status, study protocols and company-reported outcomes. Improved typography, navigation and source icons.
15 September 2026 · Experience update: added family explanations, centre lookup, evidence filters, record links, correction requests and the source-review register; corrected mobile layout.
15 September 2026 · Initial source review: recorded the operative MD-5 reference 000248, September BIS licence, legal identity registry match and source-specific research limitations.
Use “Ask about this record” beside any entry. Include the reference, source date and the correction needed. The link prepares an email for you to review and send.
Verification contact supplied for this page: Gokul Rao · care@pinnacleblooms.org · 9100 181 181. The dossier names its own approving authority; that approval is not presented as approval of this page.
Original documents take priority over cover letters, brochures and website summaries. The review date describes our inspection, not a fresh confirmation from the issuer.
Business identity, quality systems, clinical evidence and government appreciation serve different purposes. Ask what each one means for your child’s plan; individual outcomes vary.
A supplied original or primary publication record was inspected. Current status and independent validation are separate checks.
Registry record matched
The exact entity and identifier were checked against an official registry on the review date.
Company-published
Published by Pinnacle or its authors. This label does not imply independent validation.
Evidence scope
An adjacent scope label distinguishes a historical certificate, an application, a study protocol or a company-reported outcome. Original review does not expand what the document establishes.
Review boundaries & publication notes +
The source register was prepared on 15 September 2026, with selected originals and review conclusions rechecked on 18 September 2026. The page does not represent a regulator’s certification service. The named verification contact can help with source questions and corrections. The cited organisations have not endorsed this page. Live registry matches are counted only when an exact record has been checked against an official registry source.
Public document copies preserve issuer, entity, reference, scope and dates while removing personal identifiers and signatures where appropriate. A document’s stated validity is recorded separately from a live check for suspension, cancellation or changes. View file-integrity records.
Research protocols describe planned methods. Company summaries and operational totals are not substitutes for completed study results with methods, populations, outcomes and limitations.
A practical reading guide to the credentials, report types and international classifications used on this page. Each definition links to its Pinnacle source record.
SaMDSoftware as a Medical Device
Software intended for a medical purpose without being part of a hardware medical device. PinnacleAI® GPT-OS is listed as Class B, non-diagnostic developmental-support software in the supplied MD-5.
The application submitted for a licence to manufacture Class A or Class B medical devices. An application is a step in the regulatory record; it is not the issued licence.
The issued licence records the named manufacturer, premises, device and intended use. Pinnacle’s supplied MD-5 names PinnacleAI® GPT-OS v1.0.0 for non-diagnostic developmental support, ages 0–12.
BIS scopeBureau of Indian Standards licence and scope schedule
The reviewed BIS record describes the management system and activities within its named scope, including developmental-support software modules. It does not establish every centre’s registration or guarantee clinical outcomes.
The registry assigns a facility identifier. This page lists identifiers found in the supplied workbook and certificate copies. Source review is separate from confirming a facility’s current registry status, operational status or clinical quality.
An identifier for a practitioner’s document. The two supplied report numbers are recorded here; their particulars have not been independently matched on the ICAI portal in this review. A UDIN does not extend a report’s scope.
SAE 3000Limited-assurance report in this evidence collection
The supplied practitioner report gives limited assurance over specified institutional assertions and counting criteria. Read its dated thresholds and scope; it does not validate every headline statistic or a child’s clinical outcome.
SRS 4400Agreed-upon procedures and factual findings
The supplied report records procedures and findings for defined institutional counts. It does not provide an assurance opinion. Its observed counts and the SAE 3000 assertion floors have different reporting roles.
ICD-11International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision
World Health Organization. A common classification and clinical terminology for recording, comparing and aggregating health information. It gives health-related records a consistent reference language. Pinnacle’s dossier describes ICD-11 reference alignment; this does not make the software diagnostic.
ICFInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
World Health Organization. A framework covering body functions and structures, activities, participation and environmental context. It helps keep daily life and the support needed to participate in view. Pinnacle’s handout and dossier describe ICF mappings. The dossier’s b-code examples describe body functions; activity, participation and environment need their own relevant codes.
ICHIInternational Classification of Health Interventions
World Health Organization. A classification for recording and analysing health interventions through their target, action and means. It can help describe what intervention is delivered in a consistent way. Pinnacle’s dossier describes ICHI intervention coding within its architecture.
SNOMED International. A detailed clinical terminology that represents information through concepts, descriptions and relationships. It supports consistent meaning in electronic clinical records. Pinnacle’s dossier describes SNOMED CT terminology alignment. SNOMED International is the responsible organisation.
Ask the Pinnacle team about your child’s starting abilities, the proposed goals, who coordinates care and when progress will be reviewed. Bring the evidence questions that matter to your family.
Section linkWhat is PinnacleAI® GPT-OS licensed for?
The supplied MD-5 lists PinnacleAI® GPT-OS v1.0.0 as a Class B, non-diagnostic developmental-support device. Its scope is tied to the named device, version, intended use and premises; it does not establish diagnostic authority or guarantee clinical outcomes.
Are an MD-3 application and an MD-5 licence the same?
No. MD-3 is an application for a manufacturing licence. MD-5 is the issued manufacturing licence. The original application is reviewed; Class B is recorded on the issued MD-5. The separate issued classification decision copy was not available for inspection.
They describe specified management systems and the activities and locations within their scope. They do not establish the effectiveness of every intervention or promise a particular outcome for a child.
Does a research protocol prove external validation?
No. A protocol describes planned methods. The AbilityScore external-validation record here is a protocol; completed results and their limitations are needed before treating that study as completed validation.
No. Match the named institution and premises on each document. This collection contains all 52 workbook centres and 53 distinct HFR identifiers across the workbook and certificate copies. Eight district summaries are separate; these are not counts of verified active centres.
Who can help with a correction or a current document?
Contact Gokul Rao at care@pinnacleblooms.org or 9100 181 181. Include the record title, reference number and source date so the relevant document can be located.
What does Pinnacle’s 2.7 billion+ data-point figure mean?
The September 2026 company handout reports 2.7 billion+ structured platform records, based on database rows/events with a 17 July 2026 cutoff. Examples include session entries, assessment observations and technique ratings. The number is not a count of unique children, independent trial observations or verified AI-training examples.
Does this establish the world’s largest child-development dataset?
No comparable worldwide ranking is established. For example, CentralReach reports over 5 billion clinical and financial data points, using a different counting basis. A valid comparison would need common definitions, dates, populations, data quality and permitted uses.
Does the MD-5 licence approve the entire child-development lifecycle?
The MD-5 names PinnacleAI® GPT-OS v1.0.0 and defined non-diagnostic functions for ages 0–12. The broader BIS schedule lists software processes and developmental-support modules across the journey. These instruments establish different scopes; neither guarantees outcomes or certifies global exclusivity.
Do WHO, UNICEF, CDC, NICE or UNESCO endorse Pinnacle?
No endorsement is established by the references on this page. Their guidance explains why monitoring, coordinated support, caregiver participation and inclusion matter. Pinnacle’s own documents must separately establish what Pinnacle provides.
What is the purpose of the Pinnacle developmental pathway?
Pinnacle’s purpose is to help children grow toward self-sufficiency and participation in mainstream life, with the support and accommodations each child needs. Its tagline is “Every child deserves a wonderful life.” The described approach connects ability measurement, child-specific planning, coordinated intervention, everyday practice, tracking, correction and reassessment. Individual outcomes vary.
What do 17 domains, 79 abilities and 349 skills mean?
Pinnacle describes these as different layers of its developmental framework: 17 domains, 79 abilities and 349 skills, with 591 observations and AbilityScore on a 0–1000 scale. The totals belong to Pinnacle’s architecture, not a WHO-defined numerical hierarchy. Individual plans select relevant priorities. The earlier Whitebook used 344 skills across six domains; validation of an earlier version should not be automatically transferred to the newer framework.
The company sources describe 7–9 daily techniques selected for the child’s programme, human feedback through the Fusion tracking and correction module, and monthly AbilityScore refresh. The care team should explain the child-specific goals, practice guidance, review schedule and any adjustments. This is a programme description, not a guaranteed outcome.
How do ICD-11, ICF, ICHI and SNOMED CT relate to PinnacleAI®?
Pinnacle’s dossier describes architecture and mappings using WHO’s ICD-11, ICF and ICHI, alongside SNOMED CT terminology from SNOMED International. Their roles are health information, functioning and participation, interventions, and consistent clinical meaning. Correct implementation can support interoperability; an item-by-item mapping audit was not supplied. Alignment is separate from endorsement, clinical validation and the licensed device’s intended use.
Does Pinnacle focus on a diagnosis or on everyday-life goals?
Families may arrive with questions about autism, ADHD, communication, sensory processing, movement, learning or other developmental concerns. Pinnacle’s stated purpose centres on the capabilities that help each child grow toward self-sufficiency and participate in mainstream life, with the support and accommodations they need. These are examples of individual goals, not promised results. Professional assessment identifies the support appropriate to each child; diagnosis and medical care remain important where indicated. The licensed software’s scope is non-diagnostic developmental support for ages 0–12, not treatment of every condition.
Is PinnacleAI® certified as sovereign-grade or authorised worldwide?
The reviewed documents do not establish a sovereign-grade certification or worldwide market authorisation. Pinnacle describes an architecture intended for population-scale developmental support. A specific deployment needs documented local control and governance, validated interoperability, applicable permissions, operational capacity and evidence of performance for that population. MD-5 and BIS provide the particular scopes shown in their records.
Are parents and caregivers named in the MD-5 intended use?
Yes. The MD-5 annexure states that PinnacleAI® GPT-OS is intended to assist parents, therapists, educators and caregivers through developmental ability measurement, readiness tracking, progress forecasting and adaptive therapy-plan support for ages 0–12. This explicitly includes family users of the licensed software. It does not confer professional therapist credentials or register homes as therapy centres; worldwide exclusivity has not been established.
